Statement of the Contact Group
- Country/entityKosovo
Serbia
Yugoslavia (former) - RegionEurope and Eurasia
Europe and Eurasia
Europe and Eurasia - Agreement nameStatement of the Contact Group
- Date29 Apr 1998
- Agreement statusUnilateral document
- Interim arrangementYes
- Agreement/conflict levelInterstate/intrastate conflict(s) ()
- StagePre-negotiation/process
- Conflict natureGovernment/territory
- Peace processKosovo process
- PartiesThe Contact Group was comprised of France, Italy, Germany, Russia, United Kingdom and United States.
- Third parties-
- DescriptionThis statement by the Contact Group outlines principles for a framework of dialogue and stabilisation between Belgrade and Kosovo Albanian leadership. These include rejection of terrorism, respect for rights of individuals and ethnic groups, cooperation with the OSCE Gonzalez mission, and inter-communal confidence building measures, including implementing the education agreement.
- Agreement document
Groups
- Children/youth
No specific mention.
- Disabled persons
No specific mention.
- Elderly/age
No specific mention.
- Migrant workers
No specific mention.
- Racial/ethnic/national groupGroups→Racial/ethnic/national group→RhetoricalPage 1, 6.1
To begin the urgent process of dialogue, the Contact Group recommends, and urges both Belgrade and Kosovo Albanian leadership to adopt, a framework for dialogue and a stabilisation package: The framework should be based on fundamental principles that the parties must accept, such as rejection of violence for achieving political goals, no preconditions, mutual respect, accordance with standards and principles of the OSCE and of the UN Charter, mutually agreed modalities, and protection of all individuals and ethnic groups... - Religious groups
No specific mention.
- Indigenous people
No specific mention.
- Other groups
No specific mention.
- Refugees/displaced persons
No specific mention.
- Social class
No specific mention.
Gender
- Women, girls and gender
No specific mention.
- Men and boys
No specific mention.
- LGBTI
No specific mention.
- Family
No specific mention.
State definition
- Nature of state (general)Page 1, 3.
The Contact Group...also calls on the countries of the region to confirm the respect for territorial integrity and for the inviolability of internationally recognised borders. - State configuration
No specific mention.
- Self determination
No specific mention.
- Referendum
No specific mention.
- State symbols
No specific mention.
- Independence/secessionPage 1, 2.
All members of the Contact Group are firmly opposed to independence for Kosovo and to a continuation of the unacceptable status quo. Immediate steps by the parties to reduce tension and to begin an unconditional dialogue are indispensable, and the only way to reverse the deterioration in the situation and bring about a political solution. - Accession/unification
No specific mention.
- Border delimitation
No specific mention.
- Cross-border provision
No specific mention.
Governance
- Political institutions (new or reformed)
No specific mention.
- Elections
No specific mention.
- Electoral commission
No specific mention.
- Political parties reform
No specific mention.
- Civil societyPage 2, 6.2
The stabilisation package must include, as the minimum:...Concrete inter-communal confidence building measures, including implementation of the education agreement according to the agreed timetable. The Contact Group appreciates and encourages the work of Sant’Egidio Community in this field. - Traditional/religious leaders
No specific mention.
- Public administration
No specific mention.
- Constitution
No specific mention.
Power sharing
- Political power sharing
No specific mention.
- Territorial power sharing
No specific mention.
- Economic power sharing
No specific mention.
- Military power sharing
No specific mention.
Human rights and equality
- Human rights/RoL generalPage 1, 3.
...The Contact Group calls on political leaders in the FRY and in the countries of the region to exercise maximum restraint, full respect for human rights, to prevent the introduction of arms and of armed groups from outside, and to condemn terrorism... - Bill of rights/similar
No specific mention.
- Treaty incorporationPage 1, 6.1
To begin the urgent process of dialogue, the Contact Group recommends, and urges both Belgrade and Kosovo Albanian leadership to adopt, a framework for dialogue and a stabilisation package: The framework should be based on fundamental principles that the parties must accept, such as rejection of violence for achieving political goals, no preconditions, mutual respect, accordance with standards and principles of the OSCE and of the UN Charter, mutually agreed modalities, and protection of all individuals and ethnic groups... - Civil and political rights
No specific mention.
- Socio-economic rights
No specific mention.
Rights related issues
- Citizenship
No specific mention.
- Democracy
No specific mention.
- Detention procedures
No specific mention.
- Media and communication
No specific mention.
- Mobility/access
No specific mention.
- Protection measuresRights related issues→Protection measures→Protection of civiliansPage 1, 6.1
To begin the urgent process of dialogue, the Contact Group recommends, and urges both Belgrade and Kosovo Albanian leadership to adopt, a framework for dialogue and a stabilisation package: The framework should be based on fundamental principles that the parties must accept, such as rejection of violence for achieving political goals, no preconditions, mutual respect, accordance with standards and principles of the OSCE and of the UN Charter, mutually agreed modalities, and protection of all individuals and ethnic groups... - Other
No specific mention.
Rights institutions
- NHRI
No specific mention.
- Regional or international human rights institutions
No specific mention.
Justice sector reform
- Criminal justice and emergency law
No specific mention.
- State of emergency provisions
No specific mention.
- Judiciary and courts
No specific mention.
- Prisons and detention
No specific mention.
- Traditional Laws
No specific mention.
Socio-economic reconstruction
- Development or socio-economic reconstruction
No specific mention.
- National economic plan
No specific mention.
- Natural resources
No specific mention.
- International funds
No specific mention.
- Business
No specific mention.
- Taxation
No specific mention.
- Banks
No specific mention.
Land, property and environment
- Land reform/rights
No specific mention.
- Pastoralist/nomadism rights
No specific mention.
- Cultural heritage
No specific mention.
- Environment
No specific mention.
- Water or riparian rights or access
No specific mention.
Security sector
- Security Guarantees
No specific mention.
- Ceasefire
No specific mention.
- Police
No specific mention.
- Armed forcesPage 1, 3.
The Contact Group condemns the increase in violence in recent days in Kosovo, in particular the excessive use of force by the Yugoslav Army, and the proliferation of arms in the territory... - DDR
No specific mention.
- Intelligence services
No specific mention.
- Parastatal/rebel and opposition group forces
No specific mention.
- Withdrawal of foreign forces
No specific mention.
- Corruption
No specific mention.
- Crime/organised crime
No specific mention.
- Drugs
No specific mention.
- TerrorismPage 1, 3.
...The Contact Group rejects absolutely terrorism as a means of bringing about political change as well as all other violence to suppress political dissent. The Contact Group calls on political leaders in the FRY and in the countries of the region to exercise maximum restraint, full respect for human rights, to prevent the introduction of arms and of armed groups from outside, and to condemn terrorism...
Page 1, 6.2
The stabilisation package must include, as the minimum: Cessation of repression by the Authorities in Belgrade, as specified in UNSCR 1160, and a strong condemnation of terrorism by the Kosovo Albanian leadership...
Transitional justice
- Transitional justice general
No specific mention.
- Amnesty/pardon
No specific mention.
- Courts
No specific mention.
- Mechanism
No specific mention.
- Prisoner release
No specific mention.
- Vetting
No specific mention.
- Victims
No specific mention.
- Missing persons
No specific mention.
- Reparations
No specific mention.
- Reconciliation
No specific mention.
Implementation
- UN signatory
No specific mention.
- Other international signatory
No specific mention.
- Referendum for agreement
No specific mention.
- International mission/force/similarPage 1, 6.2
The stabilisation package must include, as the minimum:...Reopening of the OSCE missions in the FRY, including Kosovo...
Page 2, 7.
The Contact Group attaches the highest priority to the immediate launching of the Gonzalez
mission, which is essential for substantial progress in the relationship between FRY and the international community. This mission is also meant to reduce tension, restore confidence and improve general prospects for dialogue. The top leadership in Belgrade should therefore immediately invite the Gonzalez mission to start its work. The Contact Group fully supports the OSCE Chairman-in-Office in his efforts to facilitate this mission. - Enforcement mechanism
No specific mention.
- Related cases
No specific mention.
- SourceOffice of the High Representative
http://www.ohr.int/?ohr_archive_taxonomy=contact-group
Contact Group Statement - Rome, 29 April 1998
1. The Contact Group met in Rome on April 29 to decide on next steps regarding the increasingly dangerous situation in Kosovo, taking into account the report of the OSCE Troika on developments since the Bonn Contact Group Ministerial.
They considered the report an important and balanced contribution to the assessment of the situation.
The Contact Group believes that the current situation is untenable.
The risk of an escalating conflict requires immediate action.
2. All members of the Contact Group are firmly opposed to independence for Kosovo and to a continuation of the unacceptable status quo.
Immediate steps by the parties to reduce tension and to begin an unconditional dialogue are indispensable, and the only way to reverse the
deterioration in the situation and bring about a political solution.
3. The Contact Group condemns the increase in violence in recent days in Kosovo, in particular the excessive use of force by the Yugoslav Army, and the proliferation of arms in the territory.
The Contact Group rejects absolutely terrorism as a means of bringing about political change as well
as all other violence to suppress political dissent.
The Contact Group calls on political leaders in the FRY and in the countries of the region to exercise maximum restraint, full respect for human rights, to prevent the introduction of arms and of armed groups from outside, and to condemn terrorism.
It also calls on the countries of the region to confirm the respect for territorial integrity and for the inviolability of internationally recognised borders.
4. The Contact Group is not seeking to impose any particular outcome for the resolution of the differences between Belgrade and Kosovo Albanian leadership.
It is for the parties themselves to determine a solution to the political status of Kosovo through negotiations.
The Contact Group notes that representatives of Belgrade and Pristina have recently stated their general willingness to open unconditional dialogue.
But the two sides have yet to agree with full authority on modalities for talks, particularly on the issue of international participation.
5. The Contact Group regards an appropriate international involvement as an essential factor to establish confidence between the parties and to facilitate talks.
6. To begin the urgent process of dialogue, the Contact Group recommends, and urges both Belgrade and Kosovo Albanian leadership to adopt, a framework for dialogue and a stabilisation package:
1. The framework should be based on fundamental principles that the parties must accept, such as rejection of violence for achieving political goals, no preconditions, mutual respect, accordance with standards and principles of the OSCE and of the UN Charter, mutually agreed modalities, and protection of all individuals and ethnic groups.
There should be mutual assurances, which the Contact Group itself will support, that the parties
will not abandon nor seek to undermine an agreement once it is reached.
The framework for dialogue must be formally endorsed by the top leadership in Belgrade and the leadership of the Kosovo Albanians.
The respective leaders must take political responsibility for initiating good-faith talks.
The framework must provide for international involvement in facilitating substantive negotiations.
2. The stabilisation package must include, as the minimum:
Cessation of repression by the Authorities in Belgrade, as specified in UNSCR 1160,
and a strong condemnation of terrorism by the Kosovo Albanian leadership.
Reopening of the OSCE missions in the FRY, including Kosovo.
Concrete inter-communal confidence building measures, including implementation of the education agreement according to the agreed timetable.
The Contact Group appreciates and encourages the work of Sant’Egidio Community in this field.
7. The Contact Group attaches the highest priority to the immediate launching of the Gonzalez mission, which is essential for substantial progress in the relationship between FRY and the international community.
This mission is also meant to reduce tension, restore confidence and improve general prospects for dialogue.
The top leadership in Belgrade should therefore immediately invite the Gonzalez mission to start its work.
The Contact Group fully supports the OSCE Chairman-in-Office in his efforts to facilitate this mission.
8. If the leadership in Belgrade agrees to the framework for dialogue, the stabilisation measures listed in para.6 are implemented, the Gonzalez mission is launched, and substantive talks begin, the Contact Group will promote a clear and achievable path towards Belgrade’s full integration in the international community, including participation in the OSCE.
We want the FRY to reap the benefits of membership in international financial and political institutions.
9. Crucial requirements set out in the Contact Group’s statements of 9 and 25 March have not yet been met.
We have therefore decided to take action to put into effect a freeze on the funds held abroad by the FRY and Serbian Governments.
If Belgrade takes the steps in paragraph six to
bring about negotiations, we will immediately reverse this decision.
We have also decided that if dialogue is blocked because of Belgrade’s non-compliance we will, by the 9th of May, take action to stop new investment in Serbia.
The Russian Federation does not associate itself with
these measures.
10. If unresolved, the situation in Kosovo threatens to spill over to other parts of the region.
The Contact Group attaches high priority to supporting the security interests of the neighbouring States and to ensuring security of borders.
It is of particular importance that developments in Kosovo should not disrupt progress in implementing the Dayton/Paris peace agreement in Bosnia, to which the Government in Belgrade is committed.
The Contact Group will contribute to the strict implementation of Res.
1160, working also with the UN and other relevant international fora.
11. The next meeting of the Contact Group will take place in Paris in May.
Office of the High Representative