Acuerdo de Cronograma de Consenso para el Futuro del Proceso de Paz
- Country/entityColombia
- RegionAmericas
- Agreement nameAcuerdo de Cronograma de Consenso para el Futuro del Proceso de Paz
- Date20 Jan 2002
- Agreement statusMultiparty signed/agreed
- Interim arrangementYes
- Agreement/conflict levelIntrastate/intrastate conflict ()
- StagePre-negotiation/process
- Conflict natureGovernment
- Peace processColombia III - Arango
- PartiesThe National Government and the FARC-EP
- Third partiesin the presence of the International Facilitation Commission, the United Nations and the Catholic Church,
- DescriptionThis agreement defines a detailed timetable for negotiations and subsequent implementation of the outcome for negotiations. It recognises the United Nations in facilitating the agreement. Source: Diálogo, negociación y ruptura con las FARC-EP y con el ELN, Biblioteca de la Paz – 1998-2000, Fundación Cultura Democrática, Ed. Álvaro Villarraga Sarmiento, Bogotá D.C., 2009 (book V) p. 268
- Agreement document
- Agreement document (original language)
Groups
- Children/youth
No specific mention.
- Disabled persons
No specific mention.
- Elderly/age
No specific mention.
- Migrant workers
No specific mention.
- Racial/ethnic/national group
No specific mention.
- Religious groups
No specific mention.
- Indigenous people
No specific mention.
- Other groups
No specific mention.
- Refugees/displaced persons
No specific mention.
- Social class
No specific mention.
Gender
- Women, girls and gender
No specific mention.
- Men and boys
No specific mention.
- LGBTI
No specific mention.
- Family
No specific mention.
State definition
- Nature of state (general)
No specific mention.
- State configuration
No specific mention.
- Self determination
No specific mention.
- Referendum
No specific mention.
- State symbols
No specific mention.
- Independence/secession
No specific mention.
- Accession/unification
No specific mention.
- Border delimitation
No specific mention.
- Cross-border provision
No specific mention.
Governance
- Political institutions (new or reformed)
No specific mention.
- Elections
No specific mention.
- Electoral commission
No specific mention.
- Political parties reform
No specific mention.
- Civil societyPage 3, Article 8,
In line with the Agreement of San Francisco, the parties will produce monthly reports, which will be communicated to the public, indicating the main aspects of progress in the dialogue and negotiations.
Page 3, Article 9,
Restart the public audiences and roundtables for the issues agreed at the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation. - Traditional/religious leadersPage 1, Untitled Preamble,
Present on 19–20 January 2002 in Los Pozos, in the municipality of San Vicente del Caguán, in the presence of the International Facilitation Commission, the United Nations and the Catholic Church, the national government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército Popular, FARC–EP) have reached the following agreement.
Pages 5-6, Article 11,
We express our gratitude to the role played by the facilitating countries and the United Nations Special Adviser. The parties will define the channels for more active international participation in support by 6 February 2002. We also express our gratitude to the support provided to the Roundtable by Nuncio Apostólico Benniamino Stella and the Catholic Church of Colombia, headed by Monsignor Alberto Giraldo, President of the Colombian Episcopal Conference, and Monsignor Francisco Múnera, Bishop of San Vicente del Caguán. - Public administration
No specific mention.
- Constitution
No specific mention.
Power sharing
- Political power sharing
No specific mention.
- Territorial power sharing
No specific mention.
- Economic power sharing
No specific mention.
- Military power sharing
No specific mention.
Human rights and equality
- Human rights/RoL general
No specific mention.
- Bill of rights/similar
No specific mention.
- Treaty incorporation
No specific mention.
- Civil and political rights
No specific mention.
- Socio-economic rights
No specific mention.
Rights related issues
- Citizenship
No specific mention.
- Democracy
No specific mention.
- Detention procedures
No specific mention.
- Media and communicationRights related issues→Media and communication→Media rolesPage 3, Article 8,
In line with the Agreement of San Francisco, the parties will produce monthly reports, which will be communicated to the public, indicating the main aspects of progress in the dialogue and negotiations. - Mobility/access
No specific mention.
- Protection measuresRights related issues→Protection measures→OtherPage 2, Recitals
10. Point 10 of the Agreement of Los Pozos states: “FARC–EP does not oppose projects for
the manual eradication and substitution of illicit crops but reiterates that such a process
must have the agreement of the communities. The national government and FARC agree
on the strategic importance of working on the protection and recovery of the
environment”. - Other
No specific mention.
Rights institutions
- NHRI
No specific mention.
- Regional or international human rights institutions
No specific mention.
Justice sector reform
- Criminal justice and emergency law
No specific mention.
- State of emergency provisions
No specific mention.
- Judiciary and courts
No specific mention.
- Prisons and detention
No specific mention.
- Traditional Laws
No specific mention.
Socio-economic reconstruction
- Development or socio-economic reconstruction
No specific mention.
- National economic plan
No specific mention.
- Natural resources
No specific mention.
- International funds
No specific mention.
- Business
No specific mention.
- Taxation
No specific mention.
- Banks
No specific mention.
Land, property and environment
- Land reform/rights
No specific mention.
- Pastoralist/nomadism rights
No specific mention.
- Cultural heritage
No specific mention.
- Environment
No specific mention.
- Water or riparian rights or access
No specific mention.
Security sector
- Security Guarantees
No specific mention.
- CeasefireSecurity sector→Ceasefire→Ceasefire provisionPage 2, Article 1,
The National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation will immediately focus on studying the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, in line with the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons.
Page 2, Article 2,
Immediately incorporate the issue of kidnapping as an inseparable part of the proposal put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons to the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation in the context of the discussion of the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.
Pages 2-3, Article 3,
Immediately incorporate the issue of the phenomenon of paramilitarism as an inseparable part of the proposal put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons to the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation in the context of the discussion of the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.
Page 3, Article 4,
In the discussion of the issue of truce with ceasefire and the cessation of hostilities, the parties will be entitled to put forward proposals to reduce the conflict.
Page 3, Article 5,
The following documents will serve as inputs to the roundtable for the continuation of talks: the proposals exchanged regarding the ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons produced for roundtable to be jointly studied by the parties, the proposal submitted by FARC–EP on subsidies for the unemployed while final agreements are reached on unemployment.
Pages 3-5, Article 10,
To achieve the objectives in this agreement, the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation has set the goal of signing specific agreements regarding the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, starting from the reduction in the conflict, with a deadline of 7 April 2002. In doing so, it will respect the timeline set out below:
The National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation will hold regular sessions from Wednesday to Friday, although these days may be modified subject to agreement by both parties.
[Summary: A detailed table is included at this point, outlining the meeting sessions.] - Police
No specific mention.
- Armed forces
No specific mention.
- DDR
No specific mention.
- Intelligence services
No specific mention.
- Parastatal/rebel and opposition group forcesPages 2-3, Article 3,
Immediately incorporate the issue of the phenomenon of paramilitarism as an inseparable part of the proposal put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons to the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation in the context of the discussion of the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.
Page 6, Article 12,
As mentioned in the Agreement of San Francisco, FARC–EP undertakes to immediately ratify the instructions for all members to abstain from sudden roadblocks (pescas milagrosas). - Withdrawal of foreign forces
No specific mention.
- Corruption
No specific mention.
- Crime/organised crime
No specific mention.
- Drugs
No specific mention.
- Terrorism
No specific mention.
Transitional justice
- Transitional justice general
No specific mention.
- Amnesty/pardon
No specific mention.
- Courts
No specific mention.
- Mechanism
No specific mention.
- Prisoner release
No specific mention.
- Vetting
No specific mention.
- Victims
No specific mention.
- Missing persons
No specific mention.
- Reparations
No specific mention.
- Reconciliation
No specific mention.
Implementation
- UN signatory
No specific mention.
- Other international signatory
No specific mention.
- Referendum for agreement
No specific mention.
- International mission/force/similarPage 3, Article 7,
The parties will form an international support commission by mutual agreement to act as a verifying body for the agreements and to overcome any obstacles that may arise, as set out in the Agreement of Caquetania. - Enforcement mechanismPage 3, Article 7,
The parties will form an international support commission by mutual agreement to act as a verifying body for the agreements and to overcome any obstacles that may arise, as set out in the Agreement of Caquetania. - Related cases
No specific mention.
- SourceUN Peacemaker. Available at: https://peacemaker.un.org/colombia-cronogramaprocesopaz2002 (Accessed 6 October 2020).
AGREEMENT ON THE CONSENSUS TIMELINE FOR THE FUTURE OF THE PEACE PROCESS
20 January 2002
Present on 19–20 January 2002 in Los Pozos, in the municipality of San Vicente del Caguán, in the presence of the International Facilitation Commission, the United Nations and the Catholic Church, the national government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército Popular, FARC–EP) have reached the following agreement.
RECITALS
The parties reiterate that the negotiated political outcome is the way to resolve the armed conflict in Colombia.
As such, they will make every effort to continue working in an atmosphere of mutual trust in order to reach agreements that make progress in the development of the process possible.
The Shared Agenda for the Transition toward a New Colombia is the cornerstone the dialogue and negotiation process between the national government and FARC.
In the Agreement of San Francisco, the parties agreed that the peace process requires a favourable atmosphere without armed confrontation.
It is essential to reach agreements that reduce the conflict.
The parties have acknowledged that this agreement and the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons set out an adequate path for the immediate development and strengthening of the peace process.
In the Agreement of San Francisco, the national government and FARC–EP agreed to immediately focus on the comprehensive study of the document of recommendations presented by the Commission of Eminent Persons.
The parties believe it is necessary to develop this agreement in terms of political support, inviting presidential candidates, political movements and parties to the National Peace Council, in addition to the various sectors of national life, subject to the agreement of the parties, in order to make their contributions to the process that is underway.
The parties agreed to immediately and fully focus on implementation of the document put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons on 17 September.
We also confirm the validity of the following documents that have been previously signed by the parties:
the Agreement of Caquetania, signed on 2 May 1999;
the Agreement of Los Pozos, signed on 9 February 2001;
and the Agreement of San Francisco de la Sombra, signed on 5 October 2001.
Point 10 of the Agreement of Los Pozos states:
“FARC–EP does not oppose projects for the manual eradication and substitution of illicit crops but reiterates that such a process must have the agreement of the communities.
The national government and FARC agree on the strategic importance of working on the protection and recovery of the environment”.
AGREEMENT
The National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation will immediately focus on studying the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, in line with the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons.
Immediately incorporate the issue of kidnapping as an inseparable part of the proposal put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons to the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation in the context of the discussion of the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.
Immediately incorporate the issue of the phenomenon of paramilitarism as an inseparable part of the proposal put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons to the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation in the context of the discussion of the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.
In the discussion of the issue of truce with ceasefire and the cessation of hostilities, the parties will be entitled to put forward proposals to reduce the conflict.
The following documents will serve as inputs to the roundtable for the continuation of talks:
the proposals exchanged regarding the ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons produced for roundtable to be jointly studied by the parties, the proposal submitted by FARC–EP on subsidies for the unemployed while final agreements are reached on unemployment.
Invite the presidential candidates, political movements and parties, and the National Peace Council to contribute to the process that is underway and exchange ideas on the political situation in the country per the Agreement of San Francisco.
The parties will form an international support commission by mutual agreement to act as a verifying body for the agreements and to overcome any obstacles that may arise, as set out in the Agreement of Caquetania.
In line with the Agreement of San Francisco, the parties will produce monthly reports, which will be communicated to the public, indicating the main aspects of progress in the dialogue and negotiations.
Restart the public audiences and roundtables for the issues agreed at the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation.
To achieve the objectives in this agreement, the National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation has set the goal of signing specific agreements regarding the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, starting from the reduction in the conflict, with a deadline of 7 April 2002.
In doing so, it will respect the timeline set out below:
The National Roundtable for Dialogue and Negotiation will hold regular sessions from Wednesday to Friday, although these days may be modified subject to agreement by both parties.
Discussion of the document of recommendations put forward by the Commission of Eminent Persons:
23 January – 8 February 2002
Presentation of the first drafts on reducing the conflict:
2 February 2002
Definition of more active participation of international support
6 February 2002
Invitations to the roundtable:
13 February – presidents of political parties and movements
14 February – presidential candidates
15 February – National Peace Council
Study of the drafts put forward by each of the parties on the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities
From 20 February 2002
Target set for the roundtable to sign the first agreements on the truce with ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, starting from the reduction in the conflict:
Deadline:
7 April 2002
Agreement on the timeline for other issues:
10 April 2002
Presentation of reports by the roundtable to the public on the last Friday of each month from February 2002.
SUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
21 Jan
Separate work by the negotiation teams
22 Jan
Separate work by the negotiation teams
23 Jan
Definition of methodologies for the talks
24 Jan
Start of talks on the elements of the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons
25 Jan
Start of talks on the elements of the Document of Recommendations of the Commission of Eminent Persons
28 Jan
Separate work by the negotiation teams
29 Jan
Separate work by the negotiation teams
30 Jan
Roundtable session on the issues agreed here
31 Jan
Roundtable session on the issues agreed here
1 Feb
Roundtable session on the issues agreed here
2 Feb
Presentation of first drafts on reducing the conflict, in addition to the issue of employment
4 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
5 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
6 Feb
Agreement on international support
7 Feb
Roundtable session on the issues agreed here
8 Feb
Roundtable session on the issues agreed here
11 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
12 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
13 Feb
Invitation to presidents of political movements and parties
14 Feb
Invitation to presidential candidates
15 Feb
Invitation to National Peace Council
18 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
19 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
20 Feb
Roundtable session on issues agreed here
21 Feb
Roundtable session on issues agreed here
22 Feb
Roundtable session on issues agreed here
25 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
26 Feb
Separate work by the negotiation teams
27 Feb
Roundtable session on issues agreed here
28 Feb
Roundtable session on issues agreed here
1 Mar
Roundtable session on issues agreed here
4 Mar
Separate work by the negotiation teams
5 Mar
Separate work by the negotiation teams
6 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
7 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
8 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
11 Mar
Separate work by the negotiation teams
12 Mar
Separate work by the negotiation teams
13 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
14 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
15 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
18 Mar
Separate work by the negotiation teams
19 Mar
Separate work by the negotiation teams
20 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
21 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
22 Mar
Study of drafts submitted by each of the parties on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
25 Mar
Preparation of final documents on the truce, starting from the reduction of conflict
26 Mar
Preparation of final documents on the truce, starting from the reduction of conflict
27 Mar
28 Mar
29 Mar
1 Apr
Inform the public
2 Apr
Separate work by the negotiation teams
3 Apr
Separate work by the negotiation teams
4 Apr
Separate work by the negotiation teams
5 Apr
Separate work by the negotiation teams
6 Apr
7 Apr
Target set by the roundtable for signing the first agreements on the truce, starting from the reduction in the conflict
8 Apr
Separate work by the negotiation teams
9 Apr
Separate work by the negotiation teams
10 Apr
Agreement on timeline for other issues
We express our gratitude to the role played by the facilitating countries and the United Nations Special Adviser.
The parties will define the channels for more active international participation in support by 6 February 2002.
We also express our gratitude to the support provided to the Roundtable by Nuncio Apostólico Benniamino Stella and the Catholic Church of Colombia, headed by Monsignor Alberto Giraldo, President of the Colombian Episcopal Conference, and Monsignor Francisco Múnera, Bishop of San Vicente del Caguán.
As mentioned in the Agreement of San Francisco, FARC–EP undertakes to immediately ratify the instructions for all members to abstain from sudden roadblocks (pescas milagrosas).