The University of EdinburghPeace Agreements DatabasePeaceRep

Joint Statement on the Acceptance, in Principle, of the Lesotho Elections Timetable

  • Country/entity

    Lesotho
  • Region

    Africa (excl MENA)
  • Agreement name

    Joint Statement on the Acceptance, in Principle, of the Lesotho Elections Timetable
  • Date

    3 Dec 1999
  • Agreement status

    Multiparty signed/agreed
  • Interim arrangement

    Yes
  • Agreement/conflict level

    Intrastate/intrastate conflict ( Lesotho Crisis (1998) )
  • Stage

    Framework/substantive - partial
  • Conflict nature

    Government
  • Peace process

    Lesotho process
  • Parties

    the Government of Lesotho and the Interim Political Authority (IPA)
  • Third parties

    -
  • Description

    Short agreement confiming that opposing political parties agree to adhere to the electoral pledge.


Groups

  • Children/youth

    No specific mention.

  • Disabled persons

    No specific mention.

  • Elderly/age

    No specific mention.

  • Migrant workers

    No specific mention.

  • Racial/ethnic/national group

    No specific mention.

  • Religious groups

    No specific mention.

  • Indigenous people

    No specific mention.

  • Other groups

    No specific mention.

  • Refugees/displaced persons

    No specific mention.

  • Social class

    No specific mention.


Gender

  • Women, girls and gender

    No specific mention.

  • Men and boys

    No specific mention.

  • LGBTI

    No specific mention.

  • Family

    No specific mention.


State definition

  • Nature of state (general)

    No specific mention.

  • State configuration

    No specific mention.

  • Self determination

    No specific mention.

  • Referendum

    No specific mention.

  • State symbols

    No specific mention.

  • Independence/secession

    No specific mention.

  • Accession/unification

    No specific mention.

  • Border delimitation

    No specific mention.

  • Cross-border provision

    No specific mention.


Governance

  • Political institutions (new or reformed)

    No specific mention.

  • Elections
    Page 1, ... Following careful consideration of the advice submitted by elections experts, the Government of Lesotho and the Interim Political Authority (IPA) have accepted, principle, a provisional Elections Time-Table prepared by two international experts who had been assigned for the task under the Agreement signed on 3rd December, 1999, between the two sides....

    Page 1, ... The provisional timetable envisages the holding of elections in Lesotho in about 10-12 months beginning from 1st May 2000,

    In accepting, in principle, the provisional time-table, the Government and the IPA recognise that the law pertaining to the Electoral Model has not yet been finalised, and the two parties underline the urgency for this resolution of the matter as soon as possible.

    However, the two sides also agree that other matters, which do not hinge on the finalisation of the Electoral Model, can be perused with immediate effect. These include preparations for fresh registration of voters, and other related matters.
    In consequence to the acceptance of the elections Time-Table, the Government and the IPA have also expressed the understanding that the IPA will continue with its mandate to prepare for elections, and that its life will come to an end one day after the announcement of election results a provided for in Section 22 of the IPA Act Number 16 of 1998.

    The two sides appeal to all stakeholders, particularly political parties, to cooperate with and support the newly appointed Independent Electoral Commission it charts the way forward for the holding of free and fair elections.
  • Electoral commission
    Page 1, ... In consequence to the acceptance of the elections Time-Table, the Government and the IPA have also expressed the understanding that the IPA will continue with its mandate to prepare for elections, and that its life will come to an end one day after the announcement of election results a provided for in Section 22 of the IPA Act Number 16 of 1998.

    The two sides appeal to all stakeholders, particularly political parties, to cooperate with and support the newly appointed Independent Electoral Commission it charts the way forward for the holding of free and fair elections.
  • Political parties reform

    No specific mention.

  • Civil society

    No specific mention.

  • Traditional/religious leaders

    No specific mention.

  • Public administration

    No specific mention.

  • Constitution

    No specific mention.


Power sharing

  • Political power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Territorial power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Economic power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Military power sharing

    No specific mention.


Human rights and equality

  • Human rights/RoL general

    No specific mention.

  • Bill of rights/similar

    No specific mention.

  • Treaty incorporation

    No specific mention.

  • Civil and political rights

    No specific mention.

  • Socio-economic rights

    No specific mention.


Rights related issues

  • Citizenship

    No specific mention.

  • Democracy

    No specific mention.

  • Detention procedures

    No specific mention.

  • Media and communication

    No specific mention.

  • Mobility/access

    No specific mention.

  • Protection measures

    No specific mention.

  • Other

    No specific mention.


Rights institutions

  • NHRI

    No specific mention.

  • Regional or international human rights institutions

    No specific mention.


Justice sector reform

  • Criminal justice and emergency law

    No specific mention.

  • State of emergency provisions

    No specific mention.

  • Judiciary and courts

    No specific mention.

  • Prisons and detention

    No specific mention.

  • Traditional Laws

    No specific mention.


Socio-economic reconstruction

  • Development or socio-economic reconstruction

    No specific mention.

  • National economic plan

    No specific mention.

  • Natural resources

    No specific mention.

  • International funds

    No specific mention.

  • Business

    No specific mention.

  • Taxation

    No specific mention.

  • Banks

    No specific mention.


Land, property and environment

  • Land reform/rights

    No specific mention.

  • Pastoralist/nomadism rights

    No specific mention.

  • Cultural heritage

    No specific mention.

  • Environment

    No specific mention.

  • Water or riparian rights or access

    No specific mention.


Security sector

  • Security Guarantees

    No specific mention.

  • Ceasefire

    No specific mention.

  • Police

    No specific mention.

  • Armed forces

    No specific mention.

  • DDR

    No specific mention.

  • Intelligence services

    No specific mention.

  • Parastatal/rebel and opposition group forces

    No specific mention.

  • Withdrawal of foreign forces

    No specific mention.

  • Corruption

    No specific mention.

  • Crime/organised crime

    No specific mention.

  • Drugs

    No specific mention.

  • Terrorism

    No specific mention.


Transitional justice

  • Transitional justice general

    No specific mention.

  • Amnesty/pardon

    No specific mention.

  • Courts

    No specific mention.

  • Mechanism

    No specific mention.

  • Prisoner release

    No specific mention.

  • Vetting

    No specific mention.

  • Victims

    No specific mention.

  • Missing persons

    No specific mention.

  • Reparations

    No specific mention.

  • Reconciliation

    No specific mention.


Implementation

  • UN signatory

    No specific mention.

  • Other international signatory

    No specific mention.

  • Referendum for agreement

    No specific mention.

  • International mission/force/similar
    Page 1, ... The two experts, who completed their mission 3 weeks ago, were Dr Kwado Afari-Gyan, from Ghana and Professor Jorgen Elklit, from Denmark. They consulted extensively on the issue with all the relevant stakeholders. ...
  • Enforcement mechanism

    No specific mention.

  • Related cases

    No specific mention.

  • Source
    Lesotho Government Website; http://www.gov.ls/documents/speeches/elections3dec1999.htm

JOINT STATEMENT ON THE ACCEPTANCE, IN PRINCIPLE, OF THE LESOTHO ELECTIONS TIMETABLE

3 December 1999

Following careful consideration of the advice submitted by elections experts, the Government of Lesotho and the Interim Political Authority (IPA) have accepted, principle, a provisional Elections Time-Table prepared by two international experts who had been assigned for the task under the Agreement signed on 3rd December, 1999, between the two sides.

The two experts, who completed their mission 3 weeks ago, were Dr Kwado Afari-Gyan, from Ghana and Professor Jorgen Elklit, from Denmark.

They consulted extensively on the issue with all the relevant stakeholders.

The provisional timetable envisages the holding of elections in Lesotho in about 10-12 months beginning from 1st May 2000,

In accepting, in principle, the provisional time-table, the Government and the IPA recognise that the law pertaining to the Electoral Model has not yet been finalised, and the two parties underline the urgency for this resolution of the matter as soon as possible.

However, the two sides also agree that other matters, which do not hinge on the finalisation of the Electoral Model, can be perused with immediate effect.

These include preparations for fresh registration of voters, and other related matters.

In consequence to the acceptance of the elections Time-Table, the Government and the IPA have also expressed the understanding that the IPA will continue with its mandate to prepare for elections, and that its life will come to an end one day after the announcement of election results a provided for in Section 22 of the IPA Act Number 16 of 1998.

The two sides appeal to all stakeholders, particularly political parties, to cooperate with and support the newly appointed Independent Electoral Commission it charts the way forward for the holding of free and fair elections.