Protocol of the Eighth Meeting of Expert Groups of Authorized Delegation of Sides Carried out in the Framework of Negotiation Processes on the Full-Scale Settlement of the Georgian-Ossetian Conflict

  • Country/entity
    Georgia
    Russia
    Ossetia
  • Region
    Europe and Eurasia
    Europe and Eurasia
    Europe and Eurasia
  • Agreement name
    Protocol of the Eighth Meeting of Expert Groups of Authorized Delegation of Sides Carried out in the Framework of Negotiation Processes on the Full-Scale Settlement of the Georgian-Ossetian Conflict
  • Date
    29 Oct 2002
  • Agreement status
    Multiparty signed/agreed
  • Interim arrangement
    Yes
  • Agreement/conflict level
    Intrastate/intrastate conflict ( Georgian Separatist Conflicts (1989 - ) )
  • Stage
    Pre-negotiation/process
  • Conflict nature
    Government/territory
  • Peace process
    South Ossetia peace process
  • Parties
    South Ossetian side
    Georgian side

    Russian Federation side
    North Ossetian side
  • Third parties
    -
  • Description
    Agreement outlines outstanding issues in the Ossetia process, including media concerns, refugee matters, the reconstruction of roads, the restoration of key social services such as hospitals. It also iterates that talks will continue.


Groups

  • Children/youth

    No specific mention.

  • Disabled persons

    No specific mention.

  • Elderly/age

    No specific mention.

  • Migrant workers

    No specific mention.

  • Racial/ethnic/national group

    No specific mention.

  • Religious groups

    No specific mention.

  • Indigenous people

    No specific mention.

  • Other groups

    No specific mention.

  • Refugees/displaced persons
    Groups→Refugees/displaced persons→Substantive
    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 6. Georgian side to speed up elaboration and adoption of the legislation on restoration and protection tights of refugees, forcedly moved and other persons, suffered from Georgian- Ossetian conflict on living space and property;
  • Social class

    No specific mention.


Gender

  • Women, girls and gender

    No specific mention.

  • Men and boys

    No specific mention.

  • LGBTI

    No specific mention.

  • Family

    No specific mention.


State definition

  • Nature of state (general)

    No specific mention.

  • State configuration

    No specific mention.

  • Self determination

    No specific mention.

  • Referendum

    No specific mention.

  • State symbols

    No specific mention.

  • Independence/secession

    No specific mention.

  • Accession/unification

    No specific mention.

  • Border delimitation

    No specific mention.

  • Cross-border provision

    No specific mention.


Governance

  • Political institutions (new or reformed)

    No specific mention.

  • Elections

    No specific mention.

  • Electoral commission

    No specific mention.

  • Political parties reform

    No specific mention.

  • Civil society
    Page 3, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 11. Co-chairman of СКК to organize meetings between residents of settlements within the conflict zone with the aim to reinforce and develop trust between sides involved in the conflict. ...
  • Traditional/religious leaders

    No specific mention.

  • Public administration

    No specific mention.

  • Constitution

    No specific mention.


Power sharing

  • Political power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Territorial power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Economic power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Military power sharing

    No specific mention.


Human rights and equality

  • Human rights/RoL general

    No specific mention.

  • Bill of rights/similar

    No specific mention.

  • Treaty incorporation

    No specific mention.

  • Civil and political rights

    No specific mention.

  • Socio-economic rights

    No specific mention.


Rights related issues

  • Citizenship

    No specific mention.

  • Democracy

    No specific mention.

  • Detention procedures

    No specific mention.

  • Media and communication
    Rights related issues→Media and communication→Media roles
    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 2. To start publishing СКК bulletin with the aim to keep population informed on the progress being made in the process of peaceful settlement;

    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 3. To hold session of СКК, where issues of СКK’s operation, introduction clarities into the mechanism of its operation and appropriateness of recently arranged block-posts of law- enforcement bodies within the conflict zone will be discussed.

    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 4. To consider expedient regular appearance of the political authorities of Georgia and South Ossetia in mass media supporting resolution of Georgian-Ossetian conflict and explanation of importance of steps being taken in the process of settlement.

    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 5. Sides to broadcast new, interactive and other types of programs providing direct contact with representatives of both sides in live with the aim to strengthen trust in the conflict zone.
  • Mobility/access

    No specific mention.

  • Protection measures
    Rights related issues→Protection measures→Protection of groups
    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 6. Georgian side to speed up elaboration and adoption of the legislation on restoration and protection tights of refugees, forcedly moved and other persons, suffered from Georgian- Ossetian conflict on living space and property;
  • Other

    No specific mention.


Rights institutions

  • NHRI

    No specific mention.

  • Regional or international human rights institutions

    No specific mention.


Justice sector reform

  • Criminal justice and emergency law

    No specific mention.

  • State of emergency provisions

    No specific mention.

  • Judiciary and courts

    No specific mention.

  • Prisons and detention

    No specific mention.

  • Traditional Laws

    No specific mention.


Socio-economic reconstruction

  • Development or socio-economic reconstruction
    Socio-economic reconstruction→Development or socio-economic reconstruction→Infrastructure and reconstruction
    Page 3, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 7. Corresponding bodies of both sides to discuss issue of reconstruction of roads within the conflict zone and also in the areas of mixed residence of Georgian and Ossetian population.

    Page 3, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 8. Sides to search possibility for the rehabilitation and reinforcement of resource base of objects of social purpose within the conflict zone (Hospital in Tskhinvali, etc.) in order to increase trust between sides.
  • National economic plan

    No specific mention.

  • Natural resources

    No specific mention.

  • International funds
    Page 3, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 9. OSCE missions in Georgia to continue holding meetings with the representatives of donors of specific projects.
  • Business

    No specific mention.

  • Taxation

    No specific mention.

  • Banks

    No specific mention.


Land, property and environment

  • Land reform/rights

    No specific mention.

  • Pastoralist/nomadism rights

    No specific mention.

  • Cultural heritage

    No specific mention.

  • Environment

    No specific mention.

  • Water or riparian rights or access

    No specific mention.


Security sector

  • Security Guarantees

    No specific mention.

  • Ceasefire

    No specific mention.

  • Police
    Page 2, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Sides elaborated following recommendations:
    ... 3. To hold session of СКК, where issues of СКK’s operation, introduction clarities into the mechanism of its operation and appropriateness of recently arranged block-posts of law- enforcement bodies within the conflict zone will be discussed.
  • Armed forces

    No specific mention.

  • DDR

    No specific mention.

  • Intelligence services

    No specific mention.

  • Parastatal/rebel and opposition group forces

    No specific mention.

  • Withdrawal of foreign forces

    No specific mention.

  • Corruption

    No specific mention.

  • Crime/organised crime

    No specific mention.

  • Drugs

    No specific mention.

  • Terrorism
    Page 1, Untitled Preamble,
    ... Participant of the meeting condemned hostage-taking act in Moscow, which entailed numerous victims. ...

Transitional justice

  • Transitional justice general

    No specific mention.

  • Amnesty/pardon

    No specific mention.

  • Courts

    No specific mention.

  • Mechanism

    No specific mention.

  • Prisoner release

    No specific mention.

  • Vetting

    No specific mention.

  • Victims

    No specific mention.

  • Missing persons

    No specific mention.

  • Reparations

    No specific mention.

  • Reconciliation

    No specific mention.


Implementation

  • UN signatory

    No specific mention.

  • Other international signatory
    Mr. Antoniu Martinsh da Kruje, acting head of OSCE, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Portugal participated in the meeting.
  • Referendum for agreement

    No specific mention.

  • International mission/force/similar

    No specific mention.

  • Enforcement mechanism

    No specific mention.

  • Related cases

    No specific mention.

  • Source
    Archive of the Georgian Ministry of Affairs; http://www.rrc.ge/law/protos_2002_26_10_E.htm

PROTOCOL OF 8TH MEETING OF EXPERT GROUPS OF AUTHORIZED DELEGATIONS OF SIDES CARRIED OUT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF NEGOTIATION PROCESSES ON THE FULL-SCALE SETTLEMENT OF THE GEORGIAN-OSSETIAN CONFLICT

Kashtelu Branku – Lisbon, 29-29 October 2002.

In accordance with the Protocol of 7th meeting of expert groups of authorized delegations of sides (Tskhinvali, 4 October 2002) the 8th meeting of expert groups of authorized delegations of sides was held in Kashtelu Branku and Lisbon (Portugal) on 26-29 October 2002 in the framework of negotiation processes on the full-scale settlement of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict through the mediation of Russian Federation, with the participation of representative of the Republic of South Ossetia – Alania, OSCE and the European Commission (list of participants attached).

Mr. Antoniu Martinsh da Kruje, acting head of OSCE, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Portugal participated in the meeting.

Participant of the meeting condemned hostage-taking act in Moscow, which entailed numerous victims.

Participants discussed situation around the conflict zone, measures to be taken in order to increase trust, guarantee for safety and realization of the agreement, and also the role of economic rehabilitation of the zone in the process of political settlement.

Participants agreed on that the previous meetings of expert groups and discussion of different aspects of political settlement, among them discussion of a draft interim document, served for improvement of mutual understanding between sides and widened basis for searching ways of settlement of the conflict acceptable for both sides.

Sides noted in alarm that the situation has been getting worse for last months, links between law-enforcement bodies and СКЦ have weakened, and that diversion from some of important agreements are being noted.

Incorrect expressions and their interpretations made by mass media resulted in lowering the level of trust reached by Georgian and South Ossetian sides.

Disregard or slow implementation of reached agreements raises suspicion among the people regarding perspectives of peaceful settlement of the problem.

Starting with regret, that the positive dynamic of conflict resolution process has been substantially violated, participants expressed their common opinion on necessity of taking effective measures, which will prevent future complications of the situation.

Sides once again underlined importance of following principals of peaceful settlement of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict, set pit in the Agreement of 24 July 1992.

Being assured in need for the fastest elimination of negative tendencies emerging recently, both sides confirm the necessity to undeviatingly follow the agreements reached earlier, reinforce measures of trust, guarantee of safety and take steps towards peaceful settlement of the conflict.

Participants underlined importance of implementation of the rehabilitation projects in order to create favorable conditions for political resolution of the problem.

They also mentioned that in order to attract investments for economic rehabilitation of the zone it is important to make definite progress in the process of political settlement of the conflict.

Participants noted particular importance of the Agreement of 23 December 2000 concluded between Governments of Russian Federation and Georgia on cooperation in the rehabilitation of economy within the zone of Georgia – South Ossetia conflict and in bringing back adoption and implementation of programs of free-will return of refugees and also regretted rate of elaboration of intergovernmental Russian-Georgian program on cooperation in rehabilitation of the economy within the zone of Georgia- South Ossetian conflict and mechanisms of its implementation.

Participants were informed on new proposals made by the European Commission regarding implementation of project, among them MTDS project, monitoring of economic situation and evaluation of demands within the conflict zone and recommended sides in conflict to hold internal consultations as soon as possible in order to study proposals in details and for their future discussions with the European Commission.

Representatives of the European Commission expresses will of the European Commission to participate in the work of experts group of authorized delegations of sides.

Participants of the meeting recommended the European Commission and sides to carry out all procedures required for the resolution of this issue.

Sides elaborated following recommendations:

1. To organize series of meetings for parliament representatives of side;

2. To start publishing СКК bulletin with the aim to keep population informed on the progress being made in the process of peaceful settlement;

3. To hold session of СКК, where issues of СКЦ’s operation, introduction clarities into the mechanism of its operation and appropriateness of recently arranged block-posts of law- enforcement bodies within the conflict zone will be discussed.

4. To consider expedient regular appearance of the political authorities of Georgia and South Ossetia in mass media supporting resolution of Georgian-Ossetian conflict and explanation of importance of steps being taken in the process of settlement.

5. Sides to broadcast new, interactive and other types of programs providing direct contact with representatives of both sides in live with the aim to strengthen trust in the conflict zone.

6. Georgian side to speed up elaboration and adoption of the legislation on restoration and protection tights of refugees, forcedly moved and other persons, suffered from Georgian- Ossetian conflict on living space and property;

7. Corresponding bodies of both sides to discuss issue of reconstruction of roads within the conflict zone and also in the areas of mixed residence of Georgian and Ossetian population.

8. Sides to search possibility for the rehabilitation and reinforcement of resource base of objects of social purpose within the conflict zone (Hospital in Tskhinvali, etc.)

in order to increase trust between sides.

9. OSCE missions in Georgia to continue holding meetings with the representatives of donors of specific projects.

10. Sides to speed up implementation of the Russian-Georgian Agreement of 23 December 2000.

11. Co-chairman of СКК to organize meetings between residents of settlements within the conflict zone with the aim to reinforce and develop trust between sides involved in the conflict.

Sides expressed their appreciation to Portuguese chairmanship of OSCE and Portugal Government for their invitation to hold 8th meeting of expert groups in Kashtelu Branku and Lisbon.

Sides thanked Kashtelu Branku authorities for their hospitality.

South Ossetian side Georgian side

Russian Federation side North Ossetian side