Framework Agreement on the Formation of the International Contact Group for the GRP-MILF Peace Process

  • Country/entity
    Philippines
    Mindanao
  • Region
    Asia and Pacific
    Asia and Pacific
  • Agreement name
    Framework Agreement on the Formation of the International Contact Group for the GRP-MILF Peace Process
  • Date
    15 Sep 2009
  • Agreement status
    Multiparty signed/agreed
  • Interim arrangement
    Yes
  • Agreement/conflict level
    Intrastate/intrastate conflict ( Philippine Insurgencies (1968 - ) )
  • Stage
    Implementation/renegotiation
  • Conflict nature
    Government/territory
  • Peace process
    Philippines - Mindanao process
  • Parties
    Rafael E. Seguis, Panel Chairman for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines
    Mohagher Iqbal, Panel Chairman for the Moro Islamic Liberation Front
  • Third parties
    Datuk Othman Bin Abdul Razak, Representative of Malaysia [Facilitator]
  • Description
    Agreement in entirety establishes the International Contact Group to engage with the GFP-MILF peace process, providing for the composition, functions and relations between all involved Parties and partners, as well as measures for safety, security, and future revision of the mandate.


Groups

  • Children/youth

    No specific mention.

  • Disabled persons

    No specific mention.

  • Elderly/age

    No specific mention.

  • Migrant workers

    No specific mention.

  • Racial/ethnic/national group

    No specific mention.

  • Religious groups

    No specific mention.

  • Indigenous people

    No specific mention.

  • Other groups

    No specific mention.

  • Refugees/displaced persons

    No specific mention.

  • Social class

    No specific mention.


Gender

  • Women, girls and gender

    No specific mention.

  • Men and boys

    No specific mention.

  • LGBTI

    No specific mention.

  • Family

    No specific mention.


State definition

  • Nature of state (general)

    No specific mention.

  • State configuration

    No specific mention.

  • Self determination

    No specific mention.

  • Referendum

    No specific mention.

  • State symbols

    No specific mention.

  • Independence/secession

    No specific mention.

  • Accession/unification

    No specific mention.

  • Border delimitation

    No specific mention.

  • Cross-border provision

    No specific mention.


Governance

  • Political institutions (new or reformed)

    No specific mention.

  • Elections

    No specific mention.

  • Electoral commission

    No specific mention.

  • Political parties reform

    No specific mention.

  • Civil society
    Page 1, Untitled Preamble
    The Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) (hereafter referred to as "The Parties") [...] Recognizing the role that interested countries and international non-government organization (INGO) can play in supporting the success of the GFP-MILF peace process hereby adopt this Framework on the Formation of the International Contact Group (ICG) for the GRP-MILF Peace Process (hereafter referred to as the "Framework")

    Page 1, Section 2. Composition
    The ICG will consist of interested countries accompanying the peace process preferably drawn from the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) and the European Union (EU) as well as accredited INGO to be invited by the Parties in consultation with the Third Party Facilitator.

    Page 2, Section 5. Participation of INGO
    Mindful of the interests of the stakeholders to benefit from and expect significant peace dividends from the ICG mission, the Parties will designate INGO that will be accredited along with their named locl NGO partners. In relation to the functions of the ICG, the INGO will perform the following roles:
    5.1. To engage and act as a bridge between the Parties, ICG, Facilitator, and their local partners and civil society in support of the peace process;
    5.2. To exchange view, provide research inputs, give feedback and advice to the Parties in coordination with the Facilitator;
    5.3. To establish communication channels in furtherance of peace process advocacy.
  • Traditional/religious leaders

    No specific mention.

  • Public administration

    No specific mention.

  • Constitution

    No specific mention.


Power sharing

  • Political power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Territorial power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Economic power sharing

    No specific mention.

  • Military power sharing

    No specific mention.


Human rights and equality

  • Human rights/RoL general

    No specific mention.

  • Bill of rights/similar

    No specific mention.

  • Treaty incorporation

    No specific mention.

  • Civil and political rights

    No specific mention.

  • Socio-economic rights

    No specific mention.


Rights related issues

  • Citizenship

    No specific mention.

  • Democracy

    No specific mention.

  • Detention procedures

    No specific mention.

  • Media and communication

    No specific mention.

  • Mobility/access

    No specific mention.

  • Protection measures

    No specific mention.

  • Other

    No specific mention.


Rights institutions

  • NHRI

    No specific mention.

  • Regional or international human rights institutions

    No specific mention.


Justice sector reform

  • Criminal justice and emergency law

    No specific mention.

  • State of emergency provisions

    No specific mention.

  • Judiciary and courts

    No specific mention.

  • Prisons and detention

    No specific mention.

  • Traditional Laws

    No specific mention.


Socio-economic reconstruction

  • Development or socio-economic reconstruction

    No specific mention.

  • National economic plan

    No specific mention.

  • Natural resources

    No specific mention.

  • International funds

    No specific mention.

  • Business

    No specific mention.

  • Taxation

    No specific mention.

  • Banks

    No specific mention.


Land, property and environment

  • Land reform/rights

    No specific mention.

  • Pastoralist/nomadism rights

    No specific mention.

  • Cultural heritage

    No specific mention.

  • Environment

    No specific mention.

  • Water or riparian rights or access

    No specific mention.


Security sector

  • Security Guarantees
    Page 1, Section 1. Mandate of the ICG
    The ICG is ad-hoc in nature and issue-specific in its engagement consistent with an international dimension in aid of the consensus that will effectively enable them to exert proper leverage and to sustain the interest of the Parties as well as maintain a level of comfort that restores mutual trust. The ICG draws its mandate from both Negotiating Peace Panels and the Third Party Facilitation:
    1.1. To implement the mutually-agreed approaches during the negotiation on a regular and consistent basis, taking into consideration the mission-specific strategies and security arrangements in cooperation with both Parties; [...]

    Page 2, Section 8. Safety and Security Guarantees
    The Parties hereby agree to extend the applicability of the GRP-MILF Agreement on Safety and Security Guarantees dated March 9, 2000 to the ICG herein set up.
  • Ceasefire

    No specific mention.

  • Police

    No specific mention.

  • Armed forces

    No specific mention.

  • DDR

    No specific mention.

  • Intelligence services

    No specific mention.

  • Parastatal/rebel and opposition group forces

    No specific mention.

  • Withdrawal of foreign forces

    No specific mention.

  • Corruption

    No specific mention.

  • Crime/organised crime

    No specific mention.

  • Drugs

    No specific mention.

  • Terrorism

    No specific mention.


Transitional justice

  • Transitional justice general

    No specific mention.

  • Amnesty/pardon

    No specific mention.

  • Courts

    No specific mention.

  • Mechanism

    No specific mention.

  • Prisoner release

    No specific mention.

  • Vetting

    No specific mention.

  • Victims

    No specific mention.

  • Missing persons

    No specific mention.

  • Reparations

    No specific mention.

  • Reconciliation

    No specific mention.


Implementation

  • UN signatory

    No specific mention.

  • Other international signatory
    Datuk Othman Bin Abdul Razak, Malaysia Facilitator
  • Referendum for agreement

    No specific mention.

  • International mission/force/similar

    No specific mention.

  • Enforcement mechanism
    Page 1, Section 1. Mandate of the ICG
    The ICG is ad-hoc in nature and issue-specific in its engagement consistent with an international dimension in aid of the consensus that will effectively enable them to exert proper leverage and to sustain the interest of the Parties as well as maintain a level of comfort that restores mutual trust. The ICG draws its mandate from both Negotiating Peace Panels and the Third Party Facilitation:
    1.1. To implement the mutually-agreed approaches during the negotiation on a regular and consistent basis, taking into consideration the mission-specific strategies and security arrangements in cooperation with both Parties; [...]

    Page 1, Section 2. Composition
    The ICG will consist of interested countries accompanying the peace process preferably drawn from the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) and the European Union (EU) as well as accredited INGO to be invited by the Parties in consultation with the Third Party Facilitator.

    Page 1, Section 3. Function
    The Parties have signed this Framework to engage the function of the ICG in the context herein state. In connection with its mandate, the ICG will perform the following functions:
    3.1. To attend and observe the face-to-face negotiations upon invitation by the Parties with the concurrence of the Facilitator;
    3.2. To conduct visits, exchange views, and give advice on discreet basis in coordination with the Parties and the Facilitator;
    3.3. To seek out the assistance of recognized experts, resource persons or groups on specific issues in order to support the Parties;
    3.4. To meet upon request by any of the Parties at various levels to help resolve substantive issues base don agreed agenda.

    Page 2, Section 8. Safety and Security Guarantees
    The Parties hereby agree to extend the applicability of the GRP-MILF Agreement on Safety and Security Guarantees dated March 9, 2000 to the ICG herein set up.

    Page 2, Section 9. Special Provision
    This Framework shall be subject to revision upon signing of the Comprehensive Compact to extend the function and role of the ICG in the implementation phase.
  • Related cases

    No specific mention.

  • Source
    UN Peacemaker http://peacemaker.un.org/philippines-agreement-ICG2009

FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON THE FORMATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONTACT GROUP FOR THE GRP-MILF PEACE PROCESS

The Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) (hereafter referred to as "the Parties")

Committed to ending conflict in Mindanao through peaceful negotiations;

Dedicated to the successful outcome of the GRP-MILF Peace Process;

Recognizing the role that interested countries and international non-government organizations (TNGO) can play in supporting the success of the GRP-MILF peace process

hereby adopt this Framework on the Formation of the International Contact Group (ICG) for the GRP-MILF Peace Process (hereafter referred to as the "Framework"):

Section 1.

Mandate of the ICG. -

The ICG is ad-hoc in nature and issue-specific in its engagement consistent with an international dimension in aid of the consensus that will effectively enable them to exert proper leverage and to sustain the interest of the Parties as well as maintain a level of comfort that restores mutual trust.

The ICG draws its mandate from both Negotiating Peace Panels and the Third Party facilitation:

1.1. To implement the mutual ly-agreed approaches during the negotiation on a regular and consistent basis, taking into consideration the mission-specific strategies and security arrangements in cooperation with both Parties;

1.2. To determine their mode of operation, including funding, as well as the adoption of their own internal rules consistent with its mandate, function and role;

and

1.3. To continue its role and function in ensuring the successful implementation of signed agreements.

Section 2.

Composition. -

The lCG will consist of interested countries accompanying the peace process preferably drawn from the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and the European Union (EU) as well as accredited INGO to be invited by the Parties in consultation with the Third Party Facilitator.

Section 3.

Functions. -

The Parties have signed this Framework to engage the function of the ICG in the context herein stated.

In connection with its mandate, the lCG will perform the following functions:

3.1. To attend and observe the face-to-face negotiations upon invitation by the Parties with the concurrence of the Facilitator;

3.2. To conduct visits, exchange views, and give advice on di screet bas is in coordination with the Parties and the Facilitator;

3.3. To seek out the assistance of recognized experts, resource persons or groups on specific issues in order to support the Parties;

and

3.4. To meet upon request by any of the Parties at various levels to help resolve substantive issues based on agreed agenda.

Section 4.

Participation of the OIC, EU and Eminent Persons.- The ICG shall invite and engage the OIC, the EU and eminent persons to participate in its activities.

Section 5.

Participation of INGO. -

Mindful of the interests of the stakeholders to benefit from and expect significant peace dividends from the ICG mission, the Parties will designate INGO that will be accredited along with their named local NGO partners.

In relation to the functions of the ICG, the INGO will perform the following roles:

5.1. To engage and act as a bridge between the Parties, JCG, Facilitator and their local partners and civil society in support of the peace process;

5.2. To exchange views, provide research inputs, give feedback and advice to the Parties in coordination with the Facilitator;

and

5.3. To establish communication channels in furtherance of peace process advocacy.

Section 6.

Relationship with the Facilitator. -

The ICG shall coordinate and work closely with the Facilitator.

The coordination between the JCG and the Facil itator will be catTied out by the representative designated by the former.

Section 7.

Confidentiality. -

All information, data or opinion generated or exchanged in connection with the work of the TCG shall be strictly privileged and confidential.

Section 8.

Safety and Security Guarantees. -

The Parties hereby agree to extend the applicability of the GRP-MILF Agreement on Safety and Security Guarantees dated March 9, 2000 to the JCG herein set up.

Section 9.

Special Provision. -

This Framework shall be subject to revision upon signing of the Comprehensive Compact to extend the function and role of the ICG in the implementation phase.

Section I 0.

Effectivity.

-This Framework shall come into force on the date of its signature.

Done this 15th of September 2009 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.