Agreement between the GoN and Kirant Janawadi Workers Party

  • Country/entity
    Nepal
  • Region
    Asia and Pacific
  • Agreement name
    Agreement between the GoN and Kirant Janawadi Workers Party
  • Date
    12 Nov 2009
  • Agreement status
    Multiparty signed/agreed
  • Interim arrangement
    Yes
  • Agreement/conflict level
    Intrastate/local conflict ( Nepalese Insurgency (1996 - 2006) )
  • Stage
    Implementation/renegotiation
  • Conflict nature
    Government
  • Peace process
    Nepal related-local processes
  • Parties
    Suman Wantawa Adihang, Convener
    Pampha Kiranti, Member
    Heet Bahadur Kepchhaki, Member
    Shiv Fago, Member
    Dr. J.B. Tamang, Member
    Rakam Chemjong, Talks Team Convener and Minister, Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction
  • Third parties
    -
  • Description
    This agreement brings the Kirant Janawadi Workers Party into the formal negotiation process and agrees to hold discussion on the demands raised bythe Kirant Janawadi Workers Party.


Local agreement properties

  • Process type
    Formal structured process
  • Rationale
    Nepal’s national peace process was anchored in the Comprehensive Peace Accord (CPA). The CPA, unlike multiple other peace accords, committed to wide-ranging guarantees to make the country ‘inclusive’ and ‘restructure the state’. The Interim Constitution that succeeded the CPA, specified multiple pathways to inclusion, comprising of, secularism, proportionate representation in state organs, adapting to a mixed-electoral system with proportional representation built in, and cultural recognition among others. Given the broad guarantees, all the movements succeeding the CPA, framed their movements around greater guarantees for inclusion and ‘state restructuring’. Thus, the demands of all the movements, and the resulting agreements between these groups and the governments, can be said to be a part of the national peace process.
  • Is there a documented link to a national peace process?
    Yes
  • Link to national process: articulated rationale
    Their demand was centred on creation of creation of a Kirat state in eastern Nepal, which was buoyed by the broad commitment to state restructuring in the CPA. The peace agreement in this database does not list their 14-point demand, so its difficult hard to recheck if the agreement committed to this state.
  • Name of Locale
    Eastern Nepal
  • Nature Of Locale
    Region
  • GPS Lat/Long (DD)
    26.808517, 87.283661
  • Participant type
    Central state actor
    Local armed group
  • Mediator, facilitator or similar
    No mention of mediator or similar

Local issues

  • Ritual/prayer and process (including use of scripture)

    No specific mention.

  • Grievance List

    No specific mention.

  • Cattle rustling/banditry

    No specific mention.

  • Social cover

    No specific mention.


Agreement between the GoN and Kirant Janawadi Workers Party

Agreement concluded on November 14, 2009

1. The Kirant Janawadi Workers Party presented 14-point demands and discussions were held on their demands.

2. Since the Kirant Janawadi Workers Party joined the negotiation process for the establishment of peace, none of its leaders and activists shall be arrested and the Kirant Janawadi Workers Party shall not carry out any activities that might affect the talks, including use and display of weapons, during the period of negotiations.

3. Discussion shall be held on the political demands of the Kirant Janawadi Workers Party and weapons management [1].

Suman Wantawa Adihang, Convener

Pampha Kiranti, Member

Heet Bahadur Kepchhaki, Member

Shiv Fago, Member

Dr. J.B. Tamang, Member

Rakam Chemjong, Talks Team Convener and Minister, Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction

1. Following the decision of the meeting of the Government of Nepal (Council of Ministers), held on December 9, 2009, ‘to be done as per the decision of the committee through discussion of the Council of Ministers, Political Committee’, in accordance with the decision of the said Committee upon discussions, the words ‘weapons management’ in the third point were removed.