Minutes of Agreement (between Ahrar al-Sham (AAS) and Jaysh al-Fatah, Idlib)
Country/entity
SyriaRegion
Middle East and North AfricaAgreement name
Minutes of Agreement (between Ahrar al-Sham (AAS) and Jaysh al-Fatah, Idlib)Date
21 Jul 2016Agreement status
Multiparty signed/agreedInterim arrangement
YesAgreement/conflict level
Intrastate/local conflict ()Stage
Pre-negotiation/processConflict nature
Inter-groupPeace process
Syrian Local AgreementsParties
Side one: Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya, represented by Brother Doctor Hussein and Abu Ahmed Tarmanin, member of the Shura of Jaysh al-Fatah [Signed]
Side two: Jund al-Aqsa, represented by Brother Khalid Khatib and Abu Hashim Miri, member of the Shura Council of al-Fatah [Signed]Third parties
Judicial Committee of Jaysh al-Fatah : Sheikh Abdu al-Rizaq al-Mahdi, Abu Jabir al-Hamawi, Abu al-Harith al-Misri, Abu Islam al-Hamawi (and) al-Mu’tasim b-Allah al-Jazrawi.Description
Ruling issued by the Presidency of the Shura Council of Idlib on behalf of the Idlib Judicial Committee of Jaysh al-Fatah providing for 9 items: (1) that the dispute be solved by the Judicial Committee; (2) that barracades be pulled back; (3, 4 & 5) that the prisoners and dead are exchanged; (6 & 7) assigning representatives from both parties; and that (8) the media hostilities end and to solve the 'judicial file' as soon as possible.
Agreement document
Agreement document (original language)
Local agreement properties
Process type
Formal structured processRationale
-> Local issues only; external support mechanism; culture of signing There is a formally established local mechanism to support the negotiation between the two Salafi armed groups (Judicial Committee). Moreover, it seems that both signing parties choose to solve daily pragmatic issues related to their armed struggle through agreements. Although one cannot speak of a “culture” of singing peace agreements, the parties are involved (in a non-proactive and non-conscious way) in a persistent practice of signing local agreements.Is there a documented link to a national peace process?
NoLink to national process: articulated rationale
No link to the national peace process in Syria is mentioned in the agreement, neither it can be inferred from further research. First, the agreement does not involve local governance actors; and the signing parties themselves are not official state representative. Second, all parties to the agreement reject the national peace process, as it would maintain Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian government in power.Name of Locale
OramNature Of Locale
CityGPS Lat/Long (DD)
35.791500, 36.568143Participant type
Local armed groupMediator, facilitator or similar
Mediator or similar referred toMediator (references)
Judicial Committee of Jaysh al-Fatah : Sheikh Abdu al-Rizaq al-Mahdi, Abu Jabir al-Hamawi, Abu al-Harith al-Misri, Abu Islam al-Hamawi (and) al-Mu’tasim b-Allah al-Jazrawi.Type of mediator/facilitator/similar
Local armed group Domestic religious organisation/leader or other elder
Local issues
- Ritual/prayer and process (including use of scripture)
No specific mention.
- Grievance ListAlthough the agreement does not refer to specific causes of the conflict, it lists nine provisions to address local grievances.
Page 1, The following terms have been agreed:
1. The problem will be referred to the Judicial Committee.
2. The two sides will pull back their barricades.
3. The deceased Jund al-Aqsa soldiers will immediately be handed over to the Executive Force
of Jaysh al-Fatah.
4. The deceased of Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya will be handed over to their families
after a medical examiner has seen them.
5. Both sides will immediately release their detainees.
6. Brother Doctor Hussein will be the one responsible for bringing any items from Harakat
Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya upon the request of the Council of Justice of Jaysh al-Fatah.
7. Brother Khalid Khatib will be the one responsible for bringing any items from Jund al-Aqsa
upon the request of the Council of Justice of Jaish al-Fatah.
8. Both sides will cease their media escalation.
9. The judicial file will be terminated as soon as possible. - Cattle rustling/banditry
No specific mention.
- Social cover
No specific mention.
In the name of Allah the Merciful
Date:
16/10/1437 Jaysh al-Fatah
Corresponding date:
21/07/2016
Presidency of the Shura Council of Idlib
Minutes of Agreement
Side one:
Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya, represented by Brother Doctor Hussein and Abu Ahmed Tarmanin, member of the Shura of Jaysh al-Fatah.
Side two:
Jund al-Aqsa, represented by Brother Khalid Khatib and Abu Hashim Miri, member of the Shura Council of al-Fatah.
Have agreed to refer the current dispute in Oram between the two sides to the following Judicial Committee:
Sheikh Abdu al-Rizaq al-Mahdi, Abu Jabir al-Hamawi, Abu al-Harith al-Misri, Abu Islam al-Hamawi (and) al-Mu’tasim b-Allah al-Jazrawi.
The following terms have been agreed:
The problem will be referred to the Judicial Committee.
The two sides will pull back their barricades.
The deceased Jund al-Aqsa soldiers will immediately be handed over to the Executive Force of Jaysh al-Fatah.
The deceased of Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya will be handed over to their families after a medical examiner has seen them.
Both sides will immediately release their detainees.
Brother Doctor Hussein will be the one responsible for bringing any items from Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya upon the request of the Council of Justice of Jaysh al-Fatah.
Brother Khalid Khatib will be the one responsible for bringing any items from Jund al-Aqsa upon the request of the Council of Justice of Jaish al-Fatah.
Both sides will cease their media escalation.
The judicial file will be terminated as soon as possible.
Side one, Doctor Hussein [illegible]
Side two, Khaled Khatib [illegible]
Members of the Presidency of the Shura Council of Idlib
- Abdi al-Rahmin al-Zurba [illegible]
- Abu al-Hassan [illegible]
- Bundur al-Jazrawi [illegible]
- Abu Ibrahim [illegible]